denk eerder dat de anti islam en anti vrijheid beweging groter is op deze site

tendentieus is een woord wat me te binnenschiet. En ja Bush is te linken aan Thyssen en aan hitler.

Amerika is niet het probleem maar de globale financiers

ja





loers

sommige mensen zijn bang voor de massa. niks van aantrekken,.

@Don baco
tja, met wat research is George Bush ook vast te linken met Kate Bush, maar dat lijkt me geen reden om te beweren dat hij muzikaal is, noch dat hij een toontje lager moet gaan zingen...

Ben zelf een enorm groot liefhebber van Amerika en baal er dan ook stevig van dat het is verworden tot een totalitaire fascistenstaat.

Het enige broeinest van radicaal anti-Amerikanisme is Amerika zelf, waar de overheid haat zaait, ter zelfverrijking landen aan de lopende band de oorlog verklaart en de eigen bevolking een loer draait met onderdrukking, censuur en een Mickey Mouse® democratie.

Maar het staat eenieder vrij om in sprookjes te dromen.

Roberts geestelijk vader van Reagonomics spreekt over de neocons als neoconnazi's.

Er is maar één geestelijk vader van Reaganomics en dat is Milton Friedman. Die is vorig jaar al overleden... Bovendien werd ook Reagan vergaand beïnvloed door neoconservatief gedachtegoed.

Wie neocons en nazi's over één kam scheert, heeft geen hersens, zo simpel is het. Die constatering heb ik bij jou niettemin al eerder gedaan, dus je reactie komt niet direct als een verrassing.

@rajvan
Toch apart dan, dat je wel alle complottheorieën over Bush snapt, maar niet zoiets simpels als een plusje bij een bericht.

Die link tussen Bush, Thyssen en Hitler is een vaststaand feit als je ijsschotsen in een rivier ook een vaststaande verbinding tussen twee oevers wilt noemen.
Maar ieder z'n eigen voorkeur voor geleuter.

Yeah dream on.

De hele lijst opgevoerd als stompzinnig geleuter van complotdenkertjes is zo vast als uitgehouwen in graniet. Sukkels.
Doe je huiswerk en denk ff mee.

Wat zijn jullie betaalde NSBers?
Loosers.

Kutamerikanen.

re Bogaers

Als je meent wel over hersens te beschikken dan weet je dat toch wel aardig te verbergen.

July 16, 2007
Or Face the End of Constitutional Democracy
Impeach Now
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran.
Bush has put in place all the necessary measures for dictatorship in the form of "executive orders" that are triggered whenever Bush declares a national emergency. Recent statements by Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff, former Republican senator Rick Santorum and others suggest that Americans might expect a series of staged, or false flag, "terrorist" events in the near future.
Many attentive people believe that the reason the Bush administration will not bow to expert advice and public opinion and begin withdrawing US troops from Iraq is that the administration intends to rescue its unpopular position with false flag operations that can be used to expand the war to Iran.

Too much is going wrong for the Bush administration: the failure of its Middle East wars, Republican senators jumping ship, Turkish troops massed on northern Iraq's border poised for an invasion to deal with Kurds, and a majority of Americans favoring the impeachment of Cheney and a near-majority favoring Bush's impeachment. The Bush administration desperately needs dramatic events to scare the American people and the Congress back in line with the militarist-police state that Bush and Cheney have fostered.

William Norman Grigg recently wrote that the GOP is "praying for a terrorist strike" to save the party from electoral wipeout in 2008.
Chertoff, Cheney, the neocon nazis, and Mossad would have no qualms about saving the bacon for the Republicans, who have enabled Bush to start two unjustified wars, with Iran waiting in the wings to be attacked in a third war.
The Bush administration has tried unsuccessfully to resurrect the terrorist fear factor by infiltrating some blowhard groups and encouraging them to talk about staging "terrorist" events. The talk, encouraged by federal agents, resulted in "terrorist" arrests hyped by the media, but even the captive media was unable to scare people with such transparent sting operations.

If the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the Middle East and to entrench the "unitary executive" at home, it will have to conduct some false flag operations that will both frighten and anger the American people and make them accept Bush's declaration of "national emergency" and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the administration could simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed without hindrance.
A series of staged or permitted attacks would be spun by the captive media as a vindication of the neoconsevatives' Islamophobic policy, the intention of which is to destroy all Middle Eastern governments that are not American puppet states. Success would give the US control over oil, but the main purpose is to eliminate any resistance to Israel's complete absorption of Palestine into Greater Israel.

Think about it. If another 9/11-type "security failure" were not in the works, why would Homeland Security czar Chertoff go to the trouble of convincing the Chicago Tribune that Americans have become complacent about terrorist threats and that he has "a gut feeling" that America will soon be hit hard?

Why would Republican warmonger Rick Santorum say on the Hugh Hewitt radio show that "between now and November, a lot of things are going to happen, and I believe that by this time next year, the American public's (sic) going to have a very different view of this war."
Throughout its existence the US government has staged incidents that the government then used in behalf of purposes that it could not otherwise have pursued. According to a number of writers, false flag operations have been routinely used by the Israeli state. During the Czarist era in Russia, the secret police would set off bombs in order to arrest those the secret police regarded as troublesome. Hitler was a dramatic orchestrator of false flag operations. False flag operations are a commonplace tool of governments.
Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?

Only a diehard minority believes in the honesty and integrity of the Bush-Cheney administration and in the truthfulness of the corporate media.
Hitler, who never achieved majority support in a German election, used the Reichstag fire to fan hysteria and push through the Enabling Act, which made him dictator. Determined tyrants never require majority support in order to overthrow constitutional orders.
The American constitutional system is near to being overthrown. Are coming "terrorist" events of which Chertoff warns and Santorum promises the means for overthrowing our constitutional democracy?

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.He can be reached at: PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com

Counterpunch